I continue not to buy the narrative that the Cameron Tories are putting a caring-sharing-centerist sheen on a right-wing hog. The accusation seems to come from the same place that the 1997 election attacks on Tony Blair for being a closet left-wing extremist.
The attacks on Blair were doomed to fail because it looked paranoid and deluded. The fact that in reality it turned not only to look that way, but to BE paranoid and deluded means its less likely to work on Cameron.
I shy from the easiness of ‘politicians are all the same’ but neither party is offering a huge shift in ideology. When people go to the ballot box i think a lot of them will be voting for which ever leader they think will be the best manager, the strongest CEO, charismatic communicator and has the ability to implement the polices which all parties seem to agree. Inspiring stuff !
It’s a sorry state of affairs for a democracy when people have to vote tactically as opposed to voting for a party which represents their views. I’ve come to realise that electorial reform is a crucial issue for me this time round. My hope is that the three parties end up neck and neck in terms of the popular vote then it will become obviously unfair that the Lib Dems get such a low percentage of seats (because their support is well spread throughout the country).
The Tories want First-Past-The-Post to remain, because it suits them, Labour want to bring in a nonsense half-hearted system which would only serve to give Lib Dem voters the chance to decide whether the Tories or Labour should win in a close battle. We need to get away from fetishising the constituency MP, we don’t need it, its crazy that we feel we have a right to ask our local MP to do us personal favours or help us out with housing problems! we send them to westminster to vote and debate on maters of state, just bloody stay there, stop feeling you have to help Mrs Smith with her broken drains, leave that to councillors.
Single-Transferable-Vote would mean that some fringe parties (BNP) get in to parlement, but frankly its right that they should. If they have 2% of the vote, they should have 2% of the MPs. If the Respect party get 5% of the popular vote they should have about 20 MPs. At least that way people who support these parties don’t feel disenfranchised, which is ultimately what leads to a lack of social cohesion.
[rant o'clock]
