In defence of appeasement

Cotton Eyed Joe, Back for good, Country House. Three of the number one hits of 1995. Remember them? seem like yesterday? 16 years ago, still pretty fresh in the memory. Think how fresh in the memory The Great War was to the people of Britain 16 years after it ended, when Hitler started to throw his weight around europe.

It was just around this time when the dust had settled and people had begun to gain just a little bit of perspective regards the biggest human catastrophe the people of the world had ever inflicted on themselves. Around a million British men had died, whole communities ripped from the country. Made worse by the realisation that it was needless, a twist of fate mixed with bad diplomacy, arrogance, badly entangled national treaties mixed with the jingoism and short sightedness of the national press. Most of all, people were starting to realise that it wasn’t just as easy as ‘Germany was to blame’, therefore we should punish them. Germany had been caught up in this European tragedy as much as anyone. This was all as fresh in the mind as ‘Back for good’ is for us today.

The one thing the country had decided was that it was to be the war to end all wars. This was mixed with an inkling of regret and guilt about the treaty of Versailles and and a smidge of respect for how Hitler seemed to be getting the country back on its feet.

Harold Macmillan wrote in his memoirs (yes, i read such crap) that in the 1930s people regarded the new phenomenon of Air War similarly to how we now (in the 60s) regard nuclear war. It was a terror, which would bring war to the home land killing countless women and children. The prime minister in the mid 30s, Baldwin, reflecting on how arial bombing had been used in the spanish civil war lamented that any future wars would simply be about which side could kill the most women and children in their homes, quickest. He wasn’t being melodramatic, he was calling it like he saw it, as he ordered the building of bomber aircraft.

On the eve of war, after Hitler had broken the Munich agreement and entered Prague, Chamberlin asked his generals to estimate how many casualties should be expected on the home front. They told him, 150,000 deaths in the first week.The truth was, terrible as it is, that slightly less than 150,000 people were killed by german bombers over the 6 years of the war. A tragedy but multiples less than was feared. They literally thought that if they couldn’t stop a war happening most of the people in the country would be dead soon, fathers, mothers, sons, daughters. Anything was better than war, Churchill was principled and probably right but he was going to get us all killed, and should quiet down.In to this comes Chamberlains quote, which is used to damn him.

“How horrible, fantastic, incredible it is that we should be digging trenches and trying on gas-masks here because of a quarrel in a far-away country between people of whom we know nothing!”

There are two strains of appeasers and they shouldn’t be tarred with the same brush. There are the nazi lovers, Mosley and the black shirts, and his sympathisers like Lord Rothermere, owner of the Daily Mail and Evening Standard, high profile but few in number. Then there are the other sort, who just wished to avoid war, wished to go the extra mile, These people were misguided as it turned out Hitler was, well, Hitler and had to be fought through force of arms but this didn’t necessarily seem to be the case at the time, and 15 years after Cotton Eye’d Joe and Austin Powers, i fear that i would wrongly have been in the appeasement camp.

Question Monkey breaks his silence on the election

It’s time for Question Monkey to come off the fence, the Sun has come out for Cameron, the Mirror for Brown, the Guardian for Clegg.

I live in a 3 way marginal, and i intend to vote, and genuinely haven’t yet decided which way to go.

There’s definitely part of me that thinks its a bad thing for a government to be in power for too long, it gets tired, complacent and corrupt. Crop rotation gives government life and energy. Cameron seems like an empty suit, but energetic, creative and non-idealistic. For all the demonising and bluster from the Tory haters he’s be on the left of the Democratic Party if he were American. But no, I just don’t see there being any strength in depth. I like Davis on civil liberties, i like Gove when he’s on Newsnight Review talking eruditely about culture, but he gets very slappable when he puts on his Education Spokesman hat. Osborne? f**k off.

I’m probably a natural Lib Dem voter, but then so are most people because the Lib Dems have lots of populist, pie-in-the-sky fairy tale policies which won’t work in the real world. Appealing, but unreal. Eg scrapping Trident to save money. for this alone i’d find it hard to go with them. We can’t make strategic defence decisions just because it saves money. It may be right or wrong to get rid of Trident, but its not something we do because we need to save a bit of money. I like Clegg though, and have done from day one, i like him because he’s unashamedly intelligent and educated. Cameron feels educated but unintelligent.

Brown is a PR disaster, but that should be a positive for him when the country is in the mood for non-celeb leaders. He looks like he’s lost the energy to govern, looks like he just wants to not get beaten too badly. I think he has a strong team, I like Miliband, Darling, Cooper… Mandleson often makes me want to stand up and applaud at his sheer political genius – as long as it can be harnessed for good and not evil.

I dunno, still haven’t decided. I really don’t want the Tories to be 5-10 seats short of the majority because i think that will involve the Ulster unionists and Scots nationalists, which would be a bad thing. I don’t want them to win, full stop.  I trust labour more on the economy, and that’s the most important thing. I’m vearing towards my default of a vote for labour, but that could still change when i’m in the booth

TV series’ that are milked till they suck

I watch a fair bit of TV, and i listen to a fair bit of music. Maybe 3-4 hours of each a day. I’d sooner be without music than TV.

I do find it a bit strange to intentionality not watch TV, or to see it as some kind of virtue not to. in the same way that it seems a little unnecessary to regulate your music listening or movie going, all things in moderation. Anyhoo…

It’s increasingly important to recognise when a series has jumped the shark. Unless its a series like The Office or Extras which an auteur (?) like Ricky Gervais has artistic control over it, the producers are going to milk it until it is way past its sell by date and people stop watching, and eventually it stops making money.

So series’ like Lost, Desperate Housewives, 24 and ‘what have you’ can suck you in and tempt you to continue watching them a long time after they stop having any artistic or entertainment merit. I really wish we’d stopped watching Lost when the island moved, and i wish we’d stopped watching Desperate Housewives when they jumped forward five years in time!

And yes, changing my blog theme in a ‘trying too hard’ ‘jumping the shark’ kind of way is supposed to be ironic.

Just to make ya feel a bit safer

I can’t help feeling that if bombers are willing to wear underpant bombs on planes detonate backpacks on the tube, then there’s not much we can do about it with out seriously infringing on our own liberty and way of life. It doesn’t mater how many scanners and searches we put in place we’re not going to have 100% security. But what percentage is would we settle for?

Its really a psychological battle. We want to be made to feel a bit safer, and maybe extra layers of security do that, whether they are effective or not is only one part of the jigsaw. If by making every one walk though an Early Learning Centre pretend scanner that makes a pleasing beep, every one calms down a bit about terrorism, then money well spent.

Torys and the gays marry

Who would have thought that a Tory leader would be trying to promote gay (or other) marriage in the tax system. We’re through the looking glass here people.

It’s a dumb policy!  don’t get me wrong.  But its interesting that he has no problem extending it to gay marriage.

It’s NYC baby!

Tenth anniversary re-post

Mid 1999, everyone was talking about what to do for the millennium. I think new years is always a bit of a let down, I always feel that I should be doing something more exciting than I actually am, so the millennium bought added internal pressure. As is usual, by early December I’d still no idea what I was going to do, bars were charging massive entry frees, anything remotely different and exciting was already booked up, so it was looking more and more like we were going to be ‘going around to someone’s house’.As soon as this realisation had set in, my mate Grumpy Man decided to lead a last ditch effort, “let’s just go down to the travel agents and see what there is, just to see”. Neither of us had any money, but we did have newly minted credit cards, which is as good as money, right?

Our first thoughts were to go somewhere obscure, Eastern Europe, Africa or Russia. Right from the off the nice travel agent lady was strangely open to the idea. We’d assumed she’d laugh at us and say ‘don’t be silly, everything was booked up a year ago’. But quite the contrary, she said people assumed everything was too dear and booked up, so no one asked.

There was a flight to Moscow on the 28th returning on the 2nd for about £300 (I think). So we thought ‘what the heck! Let’s do it!’ we didn’t book right away, we went for a walk around town to chat about it and phone people to see who would go (we were thinking 3 or 4 of are mates would definitely be up for it). To our great disappointment, no one seemed interested.

It was disappointing, but we decided we’d just go ourselves. We went back to the travel shop and right away we noticed something about an Aer Lingus deal to New York. We joked with the lady about it, saying phew, I bet that’s dear, millennium in Times Square! She nodded and looked up the price for the laugh – £400!

£400, 5 days in New York for the millennium! We couldn’t believe it. We’d heard of people spending thousands on things like this. (It goes without saying that neither of us HAD £400, but when you’ve got a credit card what’s the difference between £-300 and £-400… right?). New York, Times Square, for new years, for THE new years, too much to pass up.

[Coming soon "what happened in New York"... including ill-advised Greenwich Village tattoo story - possibly with pictures]

Here be dragons

In 1723, the The Royal Society of London for the Improvement of Natural Knowledge published a book by a man called Johann Jakob Scheuchzer. Scheuchzer was a contemporary and a correspondant of Newton.

In this book, Iterna Alpina, he detailed the dragons of the Swiss alps.

” Its length, he said, was at least seven feet ; its girth approximately that of an apple tree ; it had a head like a cat’s, but no feet. He said that he smote and slew it with the assistance of his brother Thomas. He added that before it was killed, the people of the neighbourhood complained that the milk was withdrawn from their cows, and that they could never discover the author of the mischief, but that the mischief ceased after the dragon had been killed.”

It’s easy to forget that clever and thoughtful people litteraly did believe in fairies and dragons.

Campaign to end the use of hedgehogs in the beauty industry

It came to light recently that a horrifying number of hedgehogs die every year from being overly used as hair brushes for the rich and famous. Fashion’s dirty little secret has been highlighted by the admission that at least four hedgehogs were used to brush hair during Saturday’s live X-Factor broadcast.

Long known to be an excellent hair brush, especially under studio lights their use is banned in a majority of EU countries but still completely legal in the UK & Ireland.

Northern Bank Plastic £5

Come on Northern Bank , have a heart. It’s hard enough to get N Ireland notes accepted in England without releasing plastic ones.  I had real prolonged trouble today getting my BANK to accept the note (they had to phone head office). And lets have no no more of this rubbish that shops HAVE to accept them because its Sterling, a shop doesn’t have to accept ANY note if they don’t want, they can reject it on a whim and being plastic is more than a whim!